How to Reach Us
| Editorial email | [email protected] |
| Corrections | [email protected] (subject: Correction) |
| Trademarks & legal | [email protected] |
We are a small editorial team, so email is the reliable channel and response times vary with volume - substantive corrections are prioritized over general inquiries.
What We Can and Cannot Help With
We can: review correction requests with sources, update coverage when verifiable public information changes, and answer questions about our methodology and disclaimers.
We cannot: process or trace orders (we sell nothing), recommend or connect you with any vendor, provide medical advice, or verify individual products. If you have a medical concern related to any compound, contact a qualified healthcare provider - not us, and not a forum.
Request Parameters: What Makes a Correction Actionable
Not every message can change coverage, and the difference is almost always in what arrives with the message. A correction is actionable when it carries these parameters:
| Parameter | What to include | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Page | The URL of the affected page | Coverage spans dozens of pages |
| Statement | The specific sentence or claim | Vague feedback cannot be actioned |
| Source | A link or citation supporting the change | Our evidence hierarchy applies to corrections too |
| Nature | Factually wrong / outdated / needs context | Determines the fix |
That last row has a hard limit worth stating plainly: we do not remove accurate critical coverage at anyone’s request - not vendors’, not communities’, not anyone’s. A request saying only “take this down” is not a correction; it is a suppression request, and it will be declined. A request saying “this specific figure is wrong, here is the primary source” is exactly what the channel exists for, and such corrections are made promptly and, where material, noted on the affected page.
How Coverage Gets Updated
When verifiable public information changes - a regulator acts, a trial publishes, a documented market shift occurs - the affected pages are revised and the change is reflected in our update cadence. When community sentiment shifts without verifiable anchor, we generally wait: our evidence hierarchy treats sentiment as the most volatile tier, and chasing it would make every page a mirror of whatever the latest thread says. The result is that corrections with sources move fast, and drift moves slowly, by design.
Frequently Asked Questions About Contacting Us
Can I ask you which vendor I should buy from?
No - we recommend no vendor, in any channel, ever. The channel-level comparison on our where-to-buy page describes legal, quality and recourse parameters for each lawful option; that is as close to purchasing guidance as this site gets.
I had a bad experience with a vendor - will you publish it?
We do not publish individual testimonials, positive or negative - a single unverifiable account cannot clear our evidence bar. What we do track is whether a pattern of reports exists across time, which is how community sentiment enters coverage at all.
I represent a brand mentioned on this site - how do I raise a concern?
Use the legal address above. Trademark concerns are read carefully against our nominative-fair-use position, documented on the Disclaimers page. Accurate, clearly-labeled independent coverage is not removed on request; factually wrong statements are corrected with pleasure.
Do you accept guest posts or sponsored articles?
No. Sponsored content would violate the independence rules that make the site worth reading. Advertising exists only in the reserved, clearly-labeled ad slots, under the parameters published on the Disclaimers page.
Can you help me interpret my lab results or dosing question?
No - that is medical territory. We explain how documents like COAs work generically (COA guide), but anything about your personal situation belongs with a qualified healthcare provider.